One hears theories as to why Game of Thrones, at one time the most famous and celebrated series in our genre, will never be finished. Writer Devon Eriksen offers a theory that rings true.

The words below are his. 

***

https://x.com/Devon_Eriksen_/status/1831714435549057245

Here’s what Song of Ice and Fire actually wants to be, and why George can’t finish it.

The Song of Ice and Fire isn’t actually supposed to be dark, Machiavellian, hopeless, or a subversion of Tolkien at all.

It’s just supposed to start that way.

The details may be complex, but the formula is simple. Low-fantasy version of the British Isles, torn apart by multi-sided Machiavellian power struggle, loosely based on the War of the Roses.

Things are bad because of Machiavellian power struggle.

In the background, subtle hints of external, magical, otherworldly threat. Warring factions scoff and ignore it as first. Enter the high-fantasy tropes; prophesied hero emerges to unite the morally-grey factions into an unambiguously-good pro-civilization force to confront and defeat the unambiguously-evil threat to all life.

Full transition, in the end, to epic Tolkienesque high fantasy, played straight rather than subverted.

Heroism triumphant, humanity triumphant, realm unified in peace and prosperity.

Roll credits.

Were the story to be completed thus, completed as it wants to be completed, as it yearns to be completed, every dark, gritty, Machiavellian moment would be fully justified.

Every chapter and scene filled with thugs and villains and no heroes at all would be fully justified.

Because they would merely serve to emphasize the rarity of heroes, and the need for them.

Because they would make the arrival of a true hero that much more satisfying when, late but not too late, he arrived.

ASOIAF doesn’t really want to be a subversion of Tolkien at all. It wants to be a path out of darkness and into light. It wants to be a study in how Tolkien is deeply relevant, even to a gritty, morally grey world.

This is what George knows it needs to be.

But George cannot write it.

Why?

Because he’s a socialist. And a boomer.

Socialism’s motivational core is envy, and its one underlying rule is “thou shalt not be better than me”.

The boomer’s single guiding principle is “whatever makes me feel pleasure right now is good, and whatever makes me feel bad right now is evil”.

Take these together, and you get someone who has a real problem with heroes. Heroes are, by definition, the best of us, at least on some dimension, and if your underlying motivation is envy, standing next to one is gonna make you feel bad.

This means that socialists, boomers, and socialist boomers tend not to want to believe in heroes and heroism.

They want to convince themselves that anything which appears good is secretly evil, actually, and that anyone who makes them feel or look bad is obviously evil because reasons.

So when they see a hero, they tend to call him a fascist.

Read the remainder of this entry »

Harris disparaged Trump’s visit to Arlington cemetery to honor the families of fallen servicemen. She and Biden had been invited but declined to come. Eight of the families of the slain have released public messages in return.

Odd to have two columns in a row which merely point to another man’s words, but the personal issues (and disorganization) has kept from from attending properly to my blog of late. Nonetheless, as a courtesy to my readers, I thought  this column from Twitter work of genius, and well worth passing along.

From the pen of Devon Eriksen, author of THEFT OF FIRE.

The words below are his:

Read the remainder of this entry »

Read the remainder of this entry »

Today’s required reading. The words below are his, reprinted sneakily and without permission, but with great admiration. Original is here.

***

Neither Kamala Harris nor Tim Walz has ever spent a single second of their adult lives working in the private sector. Not a second. Not one. Literally every single penny they have ever earned in their adult lives as ordinary income has been provided by sucking at the teat of the value-creating taxpayer. What is worse is that this means they know LITERALLY NOTHING about business or private enterprise.

Now you may be saying, “Oh c’mon CP, they have run organizations, they have been AROUND business, that’s good enough, right?”

No it isn’t. I’ll tell you my own story to explain why.

Read the remainder of this entry »