Father Paul Graney Tells the Truth About Black Lives Matter

Here is the reaction from the world:


A Roman Catholic church in Michigan is apologizing after one of its priests took to the pulpit to compare “evil” Black Lives Matter protesters to the 9/11 terrorists

So. His parish apologized. Likewise did the parish and the school of the Covington Catholic boys libeled by the professional propagandists in the news, as I recall.

Here or here is the official statement of guiding principles, straight from the horse’s mouth:

We foster a queer‐affirming network. When we gather, we do so with the intention of freeing ourselves from the tight grip of heteronormative thinking, or rather, the belief that all in the world are heterosexual (unless s/he or they disclose otherwise).

Apparently, s/he does not foster English grammar. But s/he does foster this:

We disrupt the Western-prescribed nuclear family structure requirement by supporting each other as extended families and “villages” that collectively care for one another, especially our children, to the degree that mothers, parents, and children are comfortable.

It is not quite clear how the “Western-prescribed nuclear family structure” is opposed to the extended family, but the village collective strikes an ominous note. Let us turn to the taxpayer funded Smithsonian Institute’s National Museum of African American History and Culture for clarification.

In their now notoriously racist pamphlet (since swept with embarrassment into the memory hole), the tireless public servants working in the scholarly fields on your dime, O taxpayer, identified the following as one of the several “Aspects and assumptions of Whiteness and White Culture in the United States”:


  • The Nuclear family: father, mother, 2.3 children is the ideal social unit
  • Husband is breadwinner and head of the household
  • Wife is homemaker and subordinate to the husband
  • Children should have their own rooms, be independent

So, apparently, the natural culture of the non-white races does not have the man as the breadwinner and head of household, nor the wife as homemaker, nor the children as independent.

So what does a non-white society look like, according to these brainiac brainworthy braintards of intellectual intellect hard at work at the taxpayer funded museum?

Let me guess: The children are all bastards sharing one yurt or cave, servile and dependent, and the man is not the head of the family, but the woman makes the money, while Hercules spins at the wheel of Omphale?

The idea that wives and daughters rule their menfolk will come as a surprise, I am sure, to the Chinese, the Zulu, or the Great Plains Indians back in the day. Do the Turkish Sultans take order from their many wives?

Or are Turks white now? Do Hindu count as white or not? They are Aryan, or so last I heard.

What about the Irish? Are they white? I seem to recall a great deal of Anti-catholic prejudice not so long ago, dismissing the Irish as lacking all these traits leading to Whiteness and success. It was the same list.

It is to these people and their fellows that the Parish apologized when a priest in a homily spoke sacred truths to the congregation.

I believe the Bishop also burned a pinch of incense to Caesar — a trifling thing, really — and ritually kissed the cloven hoof of the statue of Baphomet that rears up in the town square between the abortion service provider and the public library where transvestite story hour is held.

My fellow Catholics, it is time to revive the old work of the Supreme Sacred Congregation of the Roman and Universal Inquisition, and rid ourselves of bishops who follow the world rather than follow Christ.